Professional court reporters are not trying cases or developing legal strategies but they have a significant impact on the ability of an attorney to present information in a favorable manner. As most people hear of professional court reporters, they talk of someone who quietly types a trial document, turns it off to an advocate and leaves the judicial proceedings. Yet being an successful court reporter is more to be than just typing a copy. Below we are looking at the four major fields dividing top court reporters from poor ones.Have a look at Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters of West Palm Beach for more info on this.
It appears to go without question that a court-reporter would have a specialist and most of them do. But reporters also appear to forget, or don’t seem to care, that failure to maintain a professional appearance can impact a deposition. While most lawyers want depositions to feel relaxed in order to put deponents at ease, no lawyer wants a deposition to appear non-professional, lest the deponent think the proceeding is a “joke” and respond accordingly. Calling a well-chosen company wardrobe a talent may sound strange. But it actually is in court reporting.
Court reporters are not known, nor should they be, for putting their personalities into their jobs; it is the personality of the deponent that matters the most during a deposition. There are numerous factors that may influence the demeanor of a reporter during depositions, especially prejudice, boredom intolerance and animosity towards certain criminals. To stop these traits, lawyers usually contact a trial monitoring service that vets court-reporters for their personalities and qualifications.
Most reporters on deposition have real-time reporting skills and typing speed to keep up with even the loquacious depositions. But it is what happens after a deposition ends that determines an attorney’s “technical” value for a reporter, especially in terms of video / text synchronization and text synchronization. Video / text synchronization allows attorneys to easily skip to various points in a video deposition, while text synchronization streams the words of a deponent at the bottom of the video screen while they speak. Both applications can have a significant impact on the impression a jury has of the testimony of a deponent.
Some court reporters are only willing to make depositions at official locations ( e.g., complimentary suites provided by their reporting agency versus meeting at the deponent ‘s residence), and are not willing to make depositions last minute. But a top court reporter will always do what it takes to get information from an attorney that strengthens their case.