Material Accountability. Every day we hear this word but what does it mean exactly? From the lead paint found poisoning our children’s toys, to the large judgments Personal Injury Lawyers are winning against Big Tobacco firms for causing thousands to die from lung disease, Drug Liability is a growing issue in this world driven marketplace.Have a look at Miami Personal Injury Attorney for more info on this.
Thousands are injured or die each year from defective goods made both here and abroad, or from the long-term effects of goods proven to cause health issues. When death or injury occurs, a Product Liability Lawyer must be appointed. Drug firms, which now sell mega-million dollar promotional campaigns to the public, add their drugs with lengthy lists of possible side effects and potential health risks. At times, the lists are longer than copying the ad itself. Why? For what? They wake you up. Alert because they know bad stuff could happen to you given the good that their product can do. They protect their legal bases and try to defend against litigation.
Company lawsuits are usually based on one of these three issues: negligence, warranty violation or strict liability. The term “Product Liability” refers to manufacturers’ liability, and any or all of the parties associated with that manufacturing chain, for damages caused by the product they produce. This description is broad in nature, but manufacturers’ actual liability can scroll down to the tiniest detail of a product that makes it dangerous. In general, the cases of product liability are based on three concepts:
A style error,
Its manufacturing process defect,
The inability to warn about possible hazards.
These principles presume the manufacturer has taken careful note of the possible and expected dangers inherent in the nature of his product. Most product liability claims are therefore not based on negligence, but on a concept called ‘strict liability.’ Strict theory of liability assumes that a supplier may be held responsible whether or not he / she has behaved negligently, as it presupposes that the well-off supplier is in a stronger position to bear the costs of liability than the victim and the manufacturer incorporates the costs of such liability into the price of his product. California was the first state to assert this theory in 1963 when it stopped requiring victims to demonstrate negligence and allowed Product Liability compensation through strict liability. The theory of strict liability is rarely applied to anything but fabrication defects. Rarely does it have poor designs or no warning. If you suspect you have become the target of product liability, an experienced product liability attorney will untangle these issues for you.